76. Thinking and Acting

We think, we act, we play, we discuss, we plan, and go about our daily work as if, we are in control of ‘intelligence’. These words hide the intelligence’s working, as if, makes feel, it is our personal limited entity’s intelligence at work.

Thinking is an activity. Talking, planning, playing, etc are activities. Activity of the ‘form’ is a seeming ‘action’ or acting or expression. This includes, movements of body, (including mouth and vocal cords,  for the talking part ) , as if, action/expression is taking place. However, thinking or planning ( which again is also thinking) seems prior to action. Thinking however, is an activity in itself or an action / expression, where the movement is, formless in nature and is a direct ‘creation’ by consciousness or life itself. All movements and acting or actions are of ‘life’ itself, but the movement of forms, seems limited to form, as if, life is also limited to that form only, which is not the case in reality. In reality, there is ‘only life’ appearing as forms and formless, as we speak of objects and thoughts.

We sometimes say, think before you speak or before you act, so as to avoid self embarrassment or damage to others, to an extent, unintended.  We can tell somebody, very close, “why did you rob my money” and he may hang himself in guilt, and we may add another guilt to ourself, for ‘effecting’ such a result on that person, more far than our expectation, that seems to make us own such guilt. Here it seems, we could have, by some chance, saved the ‘happening’ if we could think correctly the consequences, prior to speech or at the right time, so as to say.

It may seem, thinking and speaking is an art to be mastered. But, thinking is an activity and speaking or acting out -is an also an activity. So think before you speak, becomes ‘act before you act’. Here the problem is that, the ‘you’ that needs to make such a ‘doing’ possible is ‘objectively ’ absent’. The doer of all deeds or activities is ‘life’ itself. Call it consciousness, life force or God or what ever. Even though it seems a separate entity, that is doing so ( thinking and speaking or acting). It is life force animating the form that is doing it. The fan may seem to rotate, but the electricity is the rotator to the form. The form is just an image to depict the expression like a painting of the painter. The painting doesn’t express anything. Life expresses itself as the painting, the painter, the forms etc.

Form is an expression of life. The expression of the form is the expression of life ‘as’ form. Thoughts and knowings are the expressions of life as formless forms, or unseen forms. The totally of all  expressions of ‘Life’ is the Universe that is known ( to life itself as knowing).

So, it is ‘life’ expressing as thoughts seemingly to forms, and ‘life’ animating forms, as if, an effect of thought.  And so All there is –is life, as forms and formless  (thought, emotions, etc) being the totality as this waking state knowing and dream state knowing, expressing itself as a world of known objects.

So next time when thinking happens and speaking happens, just know that it is all happening, with no-one separate to be in charge of happenings, other than happening itself, unfolding that way in the knowing of it.

75. Appearance, Reality and Language.

Appearance, Reality and Language are all interlinked. Appearance appears as reality and fortified by language. How does this get managed? Mysteriously- is one answer and funnily or seriously is other, out of the many more that can be brought about as more names.

When appearance appears real, meant real and felt real, it has no choice but to be real.Reality cannot ‘appear’ real or unreal, because reality is not appearance. Reality is reality. Appearance is its  pseudo effect. It’s not ‘what it is’ and hence the name. The form of appearance cannot either taken seriously ( as real) nor can be discounted ( as unreal). Hence know as appearance, meaning neither real nor unreal. ‘What’ knows the knowing of appearance can do the trick of knowing appearance as an expression of reality in what ever terms its wants itself known.

I appear to be angry, means I am neither angry nor un-angry. Its reality is not fixed. Its like making yourself appear angry to a child. You are just appearing to do so. Now, if the child believes so, it feels it real. Some children are too stubborn or smart and say, you are pretending. Now it can make you laugh and call off the show, or it can make you pretend more real as angry until the child has no option but to think that its earlier thought was a mistake and so, slowly it believes that you could be angry, and abides by, what you wanted the child to think and staert to cry, so that you can ‘now’ call off the show of being really angry or pretence angry, which by now it is not really assessing the value about.  Appearances have this quality. It can enforce, what it wants to believe. There is no one judge what is true about it and false. It is sole discretion of knowing of the ‘appearance’ which is Life itself as its source.

When we say, I appear angry or relaxed, it is an expression of ‘life’ animating this body. However, memory can twist the appearance to reality as if, I am a angry man/ bad man etc to imprint a permanent label of that expression onto the man itself, as if there could be an angry ‘man’. The temporary expression has been mentally made permanent - but mentally. Expressions change and changes are not permanent. No one gets this in the head, because there is no –one, other than an appearance and there is no head. Mind is also an expression of the source or the expression animator called ‘life’. Life becomes mind, to be used as a tool of the source to manage expressions or appearances into forced reality that is ‘not’.

What is reality? If there was no reality at all, and all that is perceived were appearances, the innocence would believe the perception to what is depicted, as if the child was assessing your anger. It believes what is expressed. So the truth remains hidden. However, the key to knowing anything is knowing itself and not the holding of the knowing as memory as a temporary part of the change. So reality by itself is a mindboggling, because as far as creation is concerned, reality is playing out as its expressions by being ‘what is’ as its appearance and boggling the mind into believing it is real, without a choice not to do so, life being mind itself.

Language is meaning making of perception. We have sign language, body language, spoken language, meaning happening to oneself as if in thought and emotions etc. So meaning making about perception, is happening as if multipronged through various forms of language and effecting the knowing, as if it was the only way to know, or forcing a knowing to take place, as if, there was  meaning or story of what the perception was. Story them becomes a reality. In the absence of a ‘separate’ knower, knowing itself acts as the knower, since all contents of experience have to known by itself, whichever way it chooses to and express, with life being the expression as well the knowing of it.

So knowing perception is packed foolproof system of getting to know whatever is depicted as real. What else there could be to know, other than knowing it the way knowing seems to know it. In fact, It is impossible to imagine any other way to beat the knowing to know better, as there is no other than knowing to do the knowing. So the game goes on, undetected as, the detector, that has to do the knowing as a  ‘who’, is also the expression and also the knower of it as the knowing of it. So life as the source of creation, expressing itself, and knowing itself by being ‘knowing’ also, is all in itself, known whichever way it desires to know itself.

So, all there is perception, made to feel real, as if there is world and people, apart from the perception of it, as depicted to the ‘knowing’ suffering or rejoicing, as the meaning given in the perception, converting its biggest joke of being its own expression but seeming like a world of objects.

Knowing at times, laughes at its own jokes, like we chuckle. Hahaha.

74. Energy and effects of IT.

Do we know energy?. Do we understand energy? How do we go about energy?. Does it exist? What is energy?.

All these are questions . The answers are anybody’s  guess and belief.

Lets us take electricity. What is electricity. It produces light in bulbs, motion in motors, magnetism in coils, shocks in persons etc etc . All the descriptions are the effects of electricity. Depending on the effect, we ‘assume’ what is causing them is ‘electricity’.

The light cant know it, the shock can know it, the motor cant know it. Etc. Either the effect is there or not there. But who or what is the cause is anybody’s guess and nobody’s confirmation.

What we are trying with electricity, is as good as with any energy. Ultimately, all energy is just one energy, which just is not measurable, feelable, knowable etc directly and whatever means we use to know, can only manage to know the ‘effect’ of energy. We are not able to know energy directly, because the essence of electricity or energy is ‘pure’ intelligence ‘exhibiting’ ‘effects’ as audible, visible, feelable,  shockable, etc measurable only as an effect and calibrated to whatever is ‘convenient’. etc. What you perceive or measure is an ‘effect’ and not IT, or whatever  we call energy. So what is ‘noticed’ is only ‘movement’ of energy called ‘effect’. Even a still visual has to be continuously maintained by ‘movement’ of energy. What energy is, no-one will ever know even though, It exists ‘effected’ as all that can ever be known.

Energy can neither be created nor destroyed. If it was not created, how did it come about.  Does it exist as something at all, that can be perceived directly unlike assuming its presence through its effects?. Is it present as an absence, which can never ever be known as to what it is?. If not perceivable, directly, it cant be said to be ‘is’ or ‘is not’. It neither ‘is’ nor ‘is not’ as energy, because what energy is, is not directly detectable as whatever its ‘core’ is. Then how do we make an ‘it’ to ‘it’ as if present?.

All said and done, energy “is” because its effects ‘are’ perceivable and all energy is one energy in different forms or differently perceived effects.

Such an intelligence is ‘Life”. It could be the only intelligence that ‘Life’ is.  It could be ‘effecting’ as the visual, audible, perceivable etc, that makes up the world and the ‘effect’ perceivable is the ‘form’ of this creation. With some ‘special’ effects as time and space, and the power to know itself called mind, the universe ‘is’. It is not a universe, but an effect created by something that is not, at least physically, but named as energy or intelligence. 

The knowing of energy is an aspect of energy itself. In fact, the knowing of ‘its’ effects is only what ‘is’, because as such, energy is present as not a thing but presence itself as intelligence or subjectivity. In some mysterious way, intelligence plays itself as ‘only’ knowing. To know is to be and to be is to know, is the ‘magic’ act.  Knowing of something makes feel it is present, and this is the ‘mysteriosity’  of the intelligence. Knowing of visual, knowing of audible etc etc, with time and space as ‘technical knowing’ is able to ‘make feel’ with some practice, as one grows up, ( but there isn’t anyone other than intelligence with its effects) as an effect of some big universe. Memory or intelligence as memory, and imagination, adds more flare to the game of increasing space of ‘here’ to everywhere and increase ‘now’ to past and future. Add to this ‘conditioning’ or ‘accepting’ forms as ‘things’ and ‘me’s and you’s, create the balance to make this game, self-sustaining and evolving as the scientific universe that appeals to us.

So energy is ‘Nothing’ as  nothing can be said about it, its ‘movement’ causes an perceivable effect or ‘knowing’ and such knowings in many aspects as of visual, audible, thought, emotions etc, which is again ever changing make up this universe of ‘form’ and objects in the mind, or using mentally empowered thingness to forms.  So interest in the game  or its aliveness is kept up by change of effect or else called ‘movement’ of effect, which is already movement of energy, as we can explain to ourselves as objects of such effect of the energy called ‘Life’ . Progress, digress, creativity, competitions, love  and hate,  etc. are the names for such movements, that maintain the ‘sense’ of energy. The effect is a impact of energy and also the sensing of its presence.

So all in all, Life is intelligence which is another word for energy, creating its effects as appearances and experiences to form that IT is perceivable ( as effects or reflections only) and with a little or more flair of time, space and a ‘feel’ of ‘thingsness’  to human body that we think we are, to make the theatrical dramatics complete.

73. Presence, Absence and You

It is not very easy, to understand how we perceive anything. Let us take an object called  X. When X is present to the seeing, we perceive its presence. Once an idea of X is firmed up, the perception of that X can from then on keep happening, whenever it feels like. Let us presume X was a car. As the car goes out of the seeing limits, it has disappeared. If anyone asks you, where the car ‘is’, you would tell him, just round the corner on the parallel road or something like that. So there is first a visual presence of the car, until it is absent to the seeing. Once it is absent to the seeing, it is present to memory or mind, what we call, ‘mentally present’. So all contents of seeing are first apparently present to the seeing and their physical absence then becomes a mental presence. This includes people and places as they seem to be mentally present somewhere, even though out of sight. So the universe being present is a combination of physical presence ( when present to ‘seeing’ ) and mental presence of all that is absent to the physical seeing.

Where is your son?, we say, he ‘is’ in the backyard. His ‘isness’  or presence is ‘fit-ted’ into physical or mental space.

If we close our eyes, the contents of physical seeing disappears and reappears in the seeing of it. So contents of seeing are present only in the seeing of it. Similarly, the rest of the universal space, including all that was seen in the past and likely to be seen in the future is floating abstractly somewhere in the mental space to be 'seen' in the thinking of it. Just like contents of seeing or physical presence of objects, ‘only’ appears in the seeing, contents of mental seeing of mental objects are available ‘only’ to the mental seeing. Mental seeing is actually thinking of the mental contents. Just like physical contents are absent when not seen, the mental contents are absent when not thought about them.

Duration or time also is such an object. A series of appearance and disappearance is ‘termed’ movement. There is no movement, other than appearing and disappearing. What disappears physically is made mentally present as a reference and compared to next physical presence, to make movement. Without ‘mind’ or mental help, there can be no movement. Physically, there is only appearing of fresh new scenes. We cannot make out the freshness of any new scene as we are caught up with mental presence, interfering with physical presence to make a ‘notion’ of change or movement.

So physical presence is what is perceived physically in the seeing and physical absence is mental presence, what is perceived mentally. It is very strange that we are able to perceive the universe mentally, as we have to assimilate all that is seen in the past and future, to make a perception of universe. In this case, when sitting in the room, that instant seeing is only for a fraction of a second and has to be assimilated with mental contents of a ‘life time’. The fractional content is physical and lifetime content is mental. In other words, the presence of  ‘your’ whole universe is purely mental with fractional or negligible physical presence. It does not sound very soothing that the universe is ‘mental’ or that there is ‘no’ physical universe.

So coming back to the point of presence, there is a physical presence of contents of seeing and mental presence of the same contents, when it ‘goes’ absent to the seeing. This means there is no complete absence of contents or a single content called X, unless it is absent to the seeing and absent to the thinking also. This means, if X is not thought about, it can be absent so totally that nothing need be discussed about X as if X was outside of time and space , physical or mental, out of universe.Therefore featuring anything, 'makes' it present and not featuring is out of the sphere of time and space.

Absence of mental content is called ‘fasting’ of the mind. All that physically disappears, including your body, when there is not seeing of it, like in sleep, must be present to the mind and that too in the thinking of it and not otherwise. So all that is featured, including time and contents of space is available only in the thinking or physical appearance of it. This being the game of MAYA, a combination of physical appearance and mental appearance makes the world that we perceive and there can be nothing outside of IT. Since we have no power to create physical appearance nor mental appearance, the notion of we, since perceived, must also be a featured content. This completes the MAYA, featuring the universe with a ‘me’ as if the centre of perception.

Since there is only contents of physical seeing and mental seeing as what is happening and there is a perceiving of it, because which we conclude that these contents ‘are’, the perceiving of the content gives it the 'isness' or presence and the contents are not separate from perceiving, The perceiving is the contents or what is happening and what is happening is the perceiving of it. If the perceiving of it is the symbol called ‘I am’ and is not separate from the contents perceived called what is happening, then what is happening is also ‘I am’. So there is only what is happening  or ‘I am’ which seem two sides of the same coin but in practice is one and the same . Perceiving is what is happening and what is happening is perceiving. Perceiving is a behaviour or capacity of ‘Presence’ making what is happening as physical presence or its absence as mental presence as if what is happening are the contents of Presence. If the material of what is happening is that of Presence and so is Perceiving as the power of the material of Presence, then all there is –is Presence, seeming to be what is happening or the Universe and such presence is ‘you’ or your nature, which all is as isness, acknowledging all that is- by being all that is as seeing and thinking of IT.       

72. Featuring of a Me-sense

The universe or the world appears to humans relatively or absolutely ( so as to say). In other words, there are two ways to view the world. One as 'real', like we normally see, where in, we are real individuals and the world or Universe if full of objects. It is more of a feeling than a seeing. The other is when whatever appears, 'feels' apparent, as if time and space were not independent reality, and the whole of 'seeing' is featured, along with a 'feel' to feel it real. In the absence of the 'feel' about the world, being missed out in the featuring of the world, only wholeness is seen or felt as ONE. 

Everybody or almost all humans, experiences a feel of individuality, as if there is a person to the body. The reality of this feeling is also the cause for reality of the the outside world, the cause being featuring of this 'feel' to the so called mind. This goes unquestioned for a life time, until it is questioned accidentally. This questioning of the ‘self feeling’ to the body, comes about in many ways, due to reading spiritual books, accidentally coming across ‘persons’ that have dealt with this syndrome  or even just like that for no apparent reason. All this, is part of what we are being featured as.

In one sense, the ‘me sense’ is felt inside the head, assuming that thoughts seemingly take place there. It is one reason that you feel tall, as if few feet from the ground. We say we are five feet six inch tall, it’s because we feel ourselves in the head. Due to some reason like getting enlightened, the ‘me sense’ may drop to the chest. Ramana used to speak of the self being situated on the right side of the heart.  In such a case, you would feel shorter by two feet and this would make no sense and would result in ‘not feeling’ a me-sense at all, which seems to be the case for awakening.

The sense of doership is the feel of a me sense. ‘Karma’ is associated with a sense of doership. Thoughts keep coming to the mind, as if a ‘me’ as  a doer was looped into the thoughts. More the thoughts, pertaining to oneself, keeps the me-sense centred to the body. This is a matter of habit or practice or simply conditioning. To a large extent, it will drop off, when it is seen that, bodies are operated by life, with no centre at all and all doing is ‘life’s’ doing, as if a common intelligence for the whole of creation.

All doing, is life doing- ‘as all’. Life features humans defending the fiction that they are individual and real. The whole human race is featured feeling individual, as if they had free will and choice. Life talks humans, walks humans etc, and makes it impossible for ‘anyone’, ( that is not) to know if what is featured is true or false. Its only with a some analysis, that it is noticed that all talk and actions are initiated through thoughts, which one has no idea,as to how it comes about. With some small analysis, one finds it difficult to grasp, how he got hold of a new idea, or grasped a new language etc or how intelligence cannot be ‘owned’.

Being featured as individual persons or forms with a ‘me-sense’ becomes more clear, when the mind gets into searching for the ‘me’ itself. The mass hallucination plays an important role, to make the featuring seem real. The extraordinary behaviour of consciousness or intelligence itself, seems ordinary, so as to say.

The ‘me-sense’ is thus a fiction. It doesn’t exist. It feels true because it is featured to feel true. Dropping away of ‘me-sense’ is what is sought in ‘seeking’ which fails again because seeking must have a ‘me-sense’ to seek, which is part of the ‘featuring’ of waking state. The whole creation of waking state is just a contract to the whole featuring of the dream state. In the dream, the dream character is more ‘light’ and more detached of having any sense of ‘me’ and so is featured not so continuous on a day to day basis.

Me-sense must make you feel contracted to the body. Its makes you feel heavy as if, gravity was only due to ‘me-sense’.  It comes at a age of 5 months to one year, when the ‘you’ is born and drops accidentally for ‘some’ midway or a few minutes before clinical death. So there is a chance to die before you die, but accidental as no death in one’s hand. It is featured too.

Seeking material gain or comfort like wealth and power, psychological comfort like peace and bliss, avoiding pain, spiritual seeking etc etc, are filling time, pretending to be a doer. There is no getting out of being individual with free will and choice. It should happen to you. It is only a feeling of no me, which has to be featured, as if featuring sadness, emotions, anger etc, that is not in one’s control. One imagines that one can drop the ‘me-sense’ with a ‘me’ taking form to do this activity and like in all probable cases, there is a small element of success. However it cannot be taken to be a path or method, as there are many other probabilities that are ‘featured’ for awakening to come about.

So there is nothing to do, just be, while all is being is Being, being featured as if objects, including humans,  including being featured as ‘awakened’.

71. Space.

What can we say about space? It seems to be everywhere in the feeling of it and no-where as a object with a scientific proof that can substantiate its existence, other than people concluding so, without any other option.

Space can be thought of something as an absence. Absence of objects could be space. But there seems to be space in matter too. It is not displaced to accommodate matter. If we accept space as non- matter or an absence, then we have to accept an idea that matter seems to be moving in / present in non-matter or in absence, like planets in space.  Its like imagining, whatever is present is basically amalgamated in what is absent. That is a paradox.

The problem remains that space cannot be something. We are not displacing anything, when we move around freely. So space has to be ‘nothing’. Then we are back to square one that, everything is appearing to float around ‘in’ nothing.  Nothing is not a matter of discussion at all, because, nothing cannot be said to be ‘is’ or is not’ or present or absent. When space is nothing, how can ‘things’ seemingly  float in ‘nothing’. Nothing can float in things but something cannot float in nothing.

Space could be mental. If so, then all objects, floating in ‘mental’ cannot be physical. They have to be mental too.  May be they are.

So a simple thing like space, seems to exist, seems to exist as something that is non-existing in terms of grasping what it could be and seems to be ‘neither’, as there is no way of understanding space.

All possibilities of space seem to work well, only in a dream. Space can be seemingly there, but not there as something and neither, to be true. If all dream scenes are made of dream material, then all that is seemingly in space has to be space material. There seems to no place that is not space. This would be much like God, existing everywhere and as no-thing to be anywhere.

What if space was ‘life’ itself as far as waking state is concerned. What if space was the most intelligent thing or intelligence personified as space. What if space could become hard and colourful at will and makes up the seeming world, with movement ‘as if, things and objects were not ‘of’ space. The effect of a man moving can be designed by space, by just being hard, at will, seemingly in motion. What if, space was life that was talking  you, walking you etc even when it can ‘keep’ you in itself, like in the womb of the mother?

Nothing can be said about space because it is not tangible as an object. If we believe that space as such, that is not tangible, and is only an intelligence that seems to make an appearance of space, as if, it is there, and not there, then we can believe in such other possibilities as God and Consciousness also with such formats. In fact, it is impossible to know something like space, but its possible to accept that space ‘is’. Mental or physical or whatever cannot be known, but we are so immersed in space, but still unable to figure out its nature, attributes, intelligence etc, because we could be that space itself, if we let go the feeling of ‘me’ to the body. Then what we are, could be characterised with the likeness of space, making it purely a background to all appearances of the universe as if the objective nature of the space itself was the universe. Just like space is a basic requirement for objects to be ‘or’ not to be, Consciousness or ‘I am’ ness is the background for the appearance of world of forms, thoughts and emotions.

Space is the best simile to what we are as Consciousness. Is, is not and neither, without attributes.

70. Experiencing and ‘Consciousness'.

This piece of blog could be a good ‘pointer’.

How to we experience this world. Is there an experience-er. How do we know?

It feels a subject - object world and it is impossible to make out the truth of what we are, unless it happens as an ‘insight’. If all thoughts with meanings are happening on its own, if all actions, as a result of thoughts and its meaning, is happening on its own, if all analysis of what is seen and heard is happening on its own, then what is the role of ‘me’ in all of this.

There is something known as a phantom leg. In this the patients leg is amputated and there is an ‘experiencing’ of a leg, as if the original leg was not amputated at all. There is itching, and all feel, as if, you had the leg intact. Now, all the ‘experiencing’ of that ‘no-leg’ is happening, but at a place where there is no-leg or where there is ‘nobody’ to experience. It can be said, that, experiencing is happening about that leg to nobody and nowhere. So is the ‘experiencing’ of all ‘THIS’ which is ( the so called universe, including your body mind). So everybody is free as even that somebody was only the ‘experiencing of it’ by nobody or mysteriously ( symbolised as consciousness).     

No-one can know, what is happening exactly there, in terms of factuality. There is nothing happeing factually, outside the experiencing and there is no-one as experience-er, outside of experiencing. Everything there is ‘mental’ and ‘mental’ is a word used for ‘nobody’ or to mystery (symbolised as consciousness).     .

Similarly we experience visual objects, where there is nothing like objects, sounds where there is nothing like sounds, pain where there is nothing like pain. Here ‘nothing like’ means- ‘apart from the experiencing of it’ or stand alone facts, outside the experiencing of it.

The experiencing of a visual is not ‘the visual’. We dream at night.  Say, Nanda is the dream character. The dream character, say, is experiencing a snake bite. The dream character also experiences fear. The Nanda lying on the bed is also experiencing a rapid heart beat. So many experiencing’s  are happening on its own and some interpretation is also happening,  explaining a meaning to that dream character ‘happenings’ and also that which is happening  to the ‘one’ lying on the bed.

So there is series of experiencing happening and thoughts happening, with meaning, about the experiencing happening. Now the meaning happening is happening as if, it is happening to a ‘body mind’, but that body-mind is also an ‘experiencing’ of that what is happening.

So, mysteriously a body-mind is first ‘happening’ as an experiencing and as an extension to that experiencing, another experiencing ‘as world’ is also happening, and experiencing of thoughts are happening to make meaning, as if that ‘extension’ is experienced by the this experience as ‘body-mind’.

The ‘feeling’ of hate, love, anger, seems to appear to this body, as a reaction, to the experiencing of that outside world and the totality of all this bunch of sensations seems as if a ‘world’ is happening to a ‘person’.

The ‘Person’ the ‘visual’, ‘audible’ olfactory, etc etc are all sensations. Sensations or sensing is another word for experiencing. So there is ‘world of sensations’ that is happening and since there is ‘no world’ outside of these sensations, and no-one to whom it is happening, it is impossible to see, what is happening, outside of these sensations.

So ‘one set’ of sensations is happening ‘to mean’ as body –mind’ and ‘another set’ of sensations is happening ‘to mean’ as the world, and there seems some action in the ‘second set’ and some reaction in the ‘first set’ as if the ‘first set’ is experiencing the ‘second set’, the meaning to which is enabled in thoughts, as thoughts are ‘meaningful’ experiences. So we are directly experiencing ‘meanings’ of ‘sensations’ or ‘thoughts’ of ‘experiences’ which makes a subject- object world.

Outside of experiencing, there is no world, no person, no body, no mind and so, nothing ‘real’ is happening. If happening of experiencing is regarded as ‘psychic’, then all there is, is a ‘psychic’ world out there, like a dream, including a dream character in a dream world, all being played out well, but no-one experiencing this waking dream as an objective ‘entity’.

That no-one (objective) is what is called consciousness which is the experience-er, as well the experiencing of something ‘that is not happening at all’ objectively.

If all this can make sense to that ‘no-one’ that you are, because experiencing this is the reading of it and meaning of it,  then,  the pointing has pointed well. Or else, this pointing will become a seed of doubt to the ‘individual’ to have his or her path, trying to get this, which is also an experiencing ‘of a person’ trying to get this, ending in success or seeking.