The sensation or seeing and hearing are the ‘give away’ pointers, in trying
to point that ‘life’ is not only inside the body and also that life is ‘not’
personal.
Let us start with the ‘seeing’.
How do we see 'conventionally'?
We think we see with our eyes and that the eyes are a lens and lights falls onto the eye lens and the signal is processed from the retina in terms of electrical / chemical signals for further process in the brains and finally we see objects or colours and shapes.
So, in the end of this process, where are we supposed to see ?. with-in the brain or not?. Since all processes start after the light hits the eye, then the seeing must happen after the light hits the eye and before the end of our brains. It should happen inside the skull where the process of converting, the sensation into 'objectification', where whatever the light has to say, gets completed.
Let us try this experiment with our mobile phone camera or a real camera. The 'image' is formed on the 'screen' of the mobile or the camera. Firstly, what is seen here is an image. Does it mean that all what we see are purely images?. Secondly, where it is seen- is within the processing unit- i.e. within the mobile or the camera itself. Do we see, like this, within our body?. Not at all. The climax is that, if we shake the mobile or the lens, the whole picture shakes. But if we, with our eye lens, jump up and down, thereby shaking our lens, nothing shakes except ourselves. This is the ‘hitch’. If all is seen ‘within’ the processing unit, we should include all perception within the processing unit' and so the whole universe becomes the processing unit, 'what we are' and such a processing unit is what ‘I am’, So the universe perceived is within. Meaning, what we are, as a perception processing unit is what can make the perceived world, 'within'. That is 'Big' one. So, I am, would be the ‘perceiving capacity’ itself, so that all processed knowing is 'inside' of IT.
Just because we close our eyes and 'content to visual knowing is nothing more that darkness' , it can only means that eye lids participate in the 'not’ seeing rather than, it can participate in the seeing. Like a switch in an electrical circuit. It can cut off the brightness, but it is not the 'generator' of brightness.
Alternately, we know that all colour is purely vibrations of light particles or some wave forms. What exists is ‘wave forms’ and life converts them to colours. Or we can say that 'Colours' are appearances of a certain wave forms and that appearances are happening only when life intercepts them. Or we can say that life converts the waves into appearances at the point of the object itself. Hence it is life that is seeing and seeing is happening at the source of colour and much before it can ever hit your eyes. It is like – as if –the life is in the 'space' itself and all waves that appears in space are getting converted by life, then and there, at the source of these waves. This is exactly how seeing is experienced.
If this was not true, the whole appearance of the universe would have to be projected within our brain and this space is too small to accommodate actual sizes of objects. So light travelling to the eye and getting processed is far fetched. No one can really cross check this aspect because all bodies are appearances in space and an appearance cannot find the 'reality'.
Therefore seeing is not done by the body and so all bodies are blind to seeing. Seeing is happening on its own outside the body itself, and animating bodies as 'seeing' bodies or blind bodies.
Now the hearing:
Assume a speaker diaphragm is vibrating. It moves- say 1mm -across its neutral position. This vibration, lets us say produces a sound like a 'bell'. Now the air of 1 mm next to the diaphragm also is pulled and pushed 1 mm across and made to vibrate and should produce another bell. Now the process transfers to every 1 mm air simultaneously and so,all these 1 mm air should individually produce the sound of a bell. Likewise, when this happens in all axis, the whole universe should be ‘belling’.
This is not our experience.
Let us assume this is wrong and the right would be that - sound travels from the speaker to our ear lobe and then this vibration is taken up by some sensory nerve and life converts it to the appearance of sound at the end of processing this vibrations. This means all hearing has to happen inside our skull.
This is also not our experience.
Since the vibration of the speaker is converted to sound at the speaker itself, the mechanism called 'life' or the 'convertor' of vibration to an appearance of sound is available at the speaker itself and conversion is happening there itself. So we can experience sound outside of the human form, at its source.
This is how we actually experience sound, at the source of vibrations. The body is deaf to sounds.
So we ‘as body’ are blind and deaf and we as a part of 'life' are the knowing of the objects and the sounds at their very source. So we are the formless in which these forms appear.
QED.
Let us start with the ‘seeing’.
How do we see 'conventionally'?
We think we see with our eyes and that the eyes are a lens and lights falls onto the eye lens and the signal is processed from the retina in terms of electrical / chemical signals for further process in the brains and finally we see objects or colours and shapes.
So, in the end of this process, where are we supposed to see ?. with-in the brain or not?. Since all processes start after the light hits the eye, then the seeing must happen after the light hits the eye and before the end of our brains. It should happen inside the skull where the process of converting, the sensation into 'objectification', where whatever the light has to say, gets completed.
Let us try this experiment with our mobile phone camera or a real camera. The 'image' is formed on the 'screen' of the mobile or the camera. Firstly, what is seen here is an image. Does it mean that all what we see are purely images?. Secondly, where it is seen- is within the processing unit- i.e. within the mobile or the camera itself. Do we see, like this, within our body?. Not at all. The climax is that, if we shake the mobile or the lens, the whole picture shakes. But if we, with our eye lens, jump up and down, thereby shaking our lens, nothing shakes except ourselves. This is the ‘hitch’. If all is seen ‘within’ the processing unit, we should include all perception within the processing unit' and so the whole universe becomes the processing unit, 'what we are' and such a processing unit is what ‘I am’, So the universe perceived is within. Meaning, what we are, as a perception processing unit is what can make the perceived world, 'within'. That is 'Big' one. So, I am, would be the ‘perceiving capacity’ itself, so that all processed knowing is 'inside' of IT.
Just because we close our eyes and 'content to visual knowing is nothing more that darkness' , it can only means that eye lids participate in the 'not’ seeing rather than, it can participate in the seeing. Like a switch in an electrical circuit. It can cut off the brightness, but it is not the 'generator' of brightness.
Alternately, we know that all colour is purely vibrations of light particles or some wave forms. What exists is ‘wave forms’ and life converts them to colours. Or we can say that 'Colours' are appearances of a certain wave forms and that appearances are happening only when life intercepts them. Or we can say that life converts the waves into appearances at the point of the object itself. Hence it is life that is seeing and seeing is happening at the source of colour and much before it can ever hit your eyes. It is like – as if –the life is in the 'space' itself and all waves that appears in space are getting converted by life, then and there, at the source of these waves. This is exactly how seeing is experienced.
If this was not true, the whole appearance of the universe would have to be projected within our brain and this space is too small to accommodate actual sizes of objects. So light travelling to the eye and getting processed is far fetched. No one can really cross check this aspect because all bodies are appearances in space and an appearance cannot find the 'reality'.
Therefore seeing is not done by the body and so all bodies are blind to seeing. Seeing is happening on its own outside the body itself, and animating bodies as 'seeing' bodies or blind bodies.
Now the hearing:
Assume a speaker diaphragm is vibrating. It moves- say 1mm -across its neutral position. This vibration, lets us say produces a sound like a 'bell'. Now the air of 1 mm next to the diaphragm also is pulled and pushed 1 mm across and made to vibrate and should produce another bell. Now the process transfers to every 1 mm air simultaneously and so,all these 1 mm air should individually produce the sound of a bell. Likewise, when this happens in all axis, the whole universe should be ‘belling’.
This is not our experience.
Let us assume this is wrong and the right would be that - sound travels from the speaker to our ear lobe and then this vibration is taken up by some sensory nerve and life converts it to the appearance of sound at the end of processing this vibrations. This means all hearing has to happen inside our skull.
This is also not our experience.
Since the vibration of the speaker is converted to sound at the speaker itself, the mechanism called 'life' or the 'convertor' of vibration to an appearance of sound is available at the speaker itself and conversion is happening there itself. So we can experience sound outside of the human form, at its source.
This is how we actually experience sound, at the source of vibrations. The body is deaf to sounds.
So we ‘as body’ are blind and deaf and we as a part of 'life' are the knowing of the objects and the sounds at their very source. So we are the formless in which these forms appear.
QED.
No comments:
Post a Comment