Nothing simply means, not existing in the way, existence is
supposed to mean, that something exist, in all state of our being. We can
say, not perceivable as a sensation that can transpose nothing to be an
objective something physically or mentally. Its not only an absence but also
absence even as a thought. A double absence.
Form to Nothing is an analogy like flame to a
fire. Heat is the energy itself or source that appears as a flame. So life is
the source itself that appears as a 'form'. By itself, form is just a shape of
'life'. Life by itself is not perceivable or is 'nothing' as perceivable, other
than as an expression in perception as appearance. it has no objective
attributes or qualities except as in 'thought'. The subjective nature of all
objects is life and the objective nature of all objects is life, appearing so
and believed to be 'real objective' in thought. So, being nothing by itself,
appears as forms and 'things or events' mentally. So source of all forms is a
mental material or dream material or nothing, but has the capacity to look like
or appear as real persons, plants, buffaloes etc.
For example, we experience a dream and wake up. Then we are
sure that the contents of the dream, did not exist as it would mean, about
existence in a matter of fact. We are not able to even have a trace of it, in
factuality. So content of dreams do not exist. They are made up of non matter.
We had the experience of reality in the dream, but the entire content, doesn't
exist, in waking state. However its only a memory, occurring ‘now’ about the
existence of a dream ‘before’ that did not exist anywhere factually.
Can we guarantee that the so called physical matters of
waking state exist? What constitutes to the reality of the objects is only by
our experience of it. In the deepest sense, its is only its knowing in shape
and form and identifying in separation by projecting our knowledge onto the
form, that brings about an apparent reality to form. We believe that objects to
forms are real and thereby experience them as or knowledge of them. So we
experience our own condition and not ‘it’ per say. It’s a game we play, so that
this subjective appearance becomes an objective world. Or else, all would
appear like to be ‘Unreal’ and dream like.
When we mean, something exist, say a tree, we imagine that firstly
it is a tree and secondly, it can exist even in your absence. Did the world
exist, before we were born, as our experience? No. We have no such experience.
Will it exist, after our death?, at least this will not be our experience. So
the world is given its existential status by our presence. Our presence is what
makes the world present, or to exist. Such a presence is made of knowing
material, that is not of matter, that is ‘content’ to knowing, as we know
matter to be. Then what is it? Its 'nothing' capable of being the world, that
apparently seems to exist.
Nothing, is the source. Its the aliveness, that prevails,
even in absence of content to our experience. We can know the absence and
presence of things or matter. Every day, we can know our absence as in waking
state, in the dream state and so on and One day, we will know, that the ‘we’ we
think we are, isn’t an entity or a existence in separation. It ‘in’ formed, by ‘thinking’
or a product of thinking that creates a separate me in here and an objective
world out there.
We think we are. God exists. We think, the is
content ot knowing, but its all knowing of content. That should be the correct
statement. May be Socrates had this in mind and made a grammar mistake, while
he wrote, ‘I think, therefore ,I am.Isness is the property that 'Nothing' exhibits in
manifestation as the world. There is an isness of the world, which is just the
knowing of creation. We ‘think’ it into existence. Such isness or knowing
capacity, is what ‘I’ am.
No comments:
Post a Comment