Thursday, 5 July 2012

70. Experiencing and ‘Consciousness'.


This piece of blog could be a good ‘pointer’.
How to we experience this world. Is there an experience-er. How do we know?
It feels a subject - object world and it is impossible to make out the truth of what we are, unless it happens as an ‘insight’. If all thoughts with meanings are happening on its own, if all actions, as a result of thoughts and its meaning, is happening on its own, if all analysis of what is seen and heard is happening on its own, then what is the role of ‘me’ in all of this.
There is something known as a phantom leg. In this the patients leg is amputated and there is an ‘experiencing’ of a leg, as if the original leg was not amputated at all. There is itching, and all feel, as if, you had the leg intact. Now, all the ‘experiencing’ of that ‘no-leg’ is happening, but at a place where there is no-leg or where there is ‘nobody’ to experience. It can be said, that, experiencing is happening about that leg to nobody and nowhere. So is the ‘experiencing’ of all ‘THIS’ which is ( the so called universe, including your body mind). So everybody is free as even that somebody was only the ‘experiencing of it’ by nobody or mysteriously ( symbolised as consciousness).     
No-one can know, what is happening exactly there, in terms of factuality. There is nothing happeing factually, outside the experiencing and there is no-one as experience-er, outside of experiencing. Everything there is ‘mental’ and ‘mental’ is a word used for ‘nobody’ or to mystery (symbolised as consciousness).     .
Similarly we experience visual objects, where there is nothing like objects, sounds where there is nothing like sounds, pain where there is nothing like pain. Here ‘nothing like’ means- ‘apart from the experiencing of it’ or stand alone facts, outside the experiencing of it.
The experiencing of a visual is not ‘the visual’. We dream at night.  Say, Nanda is the dream character. The dream character, say, is experiencing a snake bite. The dream character also experiences fear. The Nanda lying on the bed is also experiencing a rapid heart beat. So many experiencing’s  are happening on its own and some interpretation is also happening,  explaining a meaning to that dream character ‘happenings’ and also that which is happening  to the ‘one’ lying on the bed.
So there is series of experiencing happening and thoughts happening, with meaning, about the experiencing happening. Now the meaning happening is happening as if, it is happening to a ‘body mind’, but that body-mind is also an ‘experiencing’ of that what is happening.
So, mysteriously a body-mind is first ‘happening’ as an experiencing and as an extension to that experiencing, another experiencing ‘as world’ is also happening, and experiencing of thoughts are happening to make meaning, as if that ‘extension’ is experienced by the this experience as ‘body-mind’.
The ‘feeling’ of hate, love, anger, seems to appear to this body, as a reaction, to the experiencing of that outside world and the totality of all this bunch of sensations seems as if a ‘world’ is happening to a ‘person’.
The ‘Person’ the ‘visual’, ‘audible’ olfactory, etc etc are all sensations. Sensations or sensing is another word for experiencing. So there is ‘world of sensations’ that is happening and since there is ‘no world’ outside of these sensations, and no-one to whom it is happening, it is impossible to see, what is happening, outside of these sensations.
So ‘one set’ of sensations is happening ‘to mean’ as body –mind’ and ‘another set’ of sensations is happening ‘to mean’ as the world, and there seems some action in the ‘second set’ and some reaction in the ‘first set’ as if the ‘first set’ is experiencing the ‘second set’, the meaning to which is enabled in thoughts, as thoughts are ‘meaningful’ experiences. So we are directly experiencing ‘meanings’ of ‘sensations’ or ‘thoughts’ of ‘experiences’ which makes a subject- object world.
Outside of experiencing, there is no world, no person, no body, no mind and so, nothing ‘real’ is happening. If happening of experiencing is regarded as ‘psychic’, then all there is, is a ‘psychic’ world out there, like a dream, including a dream character in a dream world, all being played out well, but no-one experiencing this waking dream as an objective ‘entity’.
That no-one (objective) is what is called consciousness which is the experience-er, as well the experiencing of something ‘that is not happening at all’ objectively.
If all this can make sense to that ‘no-one’ that you are, because experiencing this is the reading of it and meaning of it,  then,  the pointing has pointed well. Or else, this pointing will become a seed of doubt to the ‘individual’ to have his or her path, trying to get this, which is also an experiencing ‘of a person’ trying to get this, ending in success or seeking.