75. Appearance, Reality and Language.

Appearance, Reality and Language are all interlinked. Appearance appears as reality and fortified by language. How does this get managed? Mysteriously- is one answer and funnily or seriously is other, out of the many more that can be brought about as more names.

When appearance appears real, meant real and felt real, it has no choice but to be real.Reality cannot ‘appear’ real or unreal, because reality is not appearance. Reality is reality. Appearance is its  pseudo effect. It’s not ‘what it is’ and hence the name. The form of appearance cannot either taken seriously ( as real) nor can be discounted ( as unreal). Hence know as appearance, meaning neither real nor unreal. ‘What’ knows the knowing of appearance can do the trick of knowing appearance as an expression of reality in what ever terms its wants itself known.

I appear to be angry, means I am neither angry nor un-angry. Its reality is not fixed. Its like making yourself appear angry to a child. You are just appearing to do so. Now, if the child believes so, it feels it real. Some children are too stubborn or smart and say, you are pretending. Now it can make you laugh and call off the show, or it can make you pretend more real as angry until the child has no option but to think that its earlier thought was a mistake and so, slowly it believes that you could be angry, and abides by, what you wanted the child to think and staert to cry, so that you can ‘now’ call off the show of being really angry or pretence angry, which by now it is not really assessing the value about.  Appearances have this quality. It can enforce, what it wants to believe. There is no one judge what is true about it and false. It is sole discretion of knowing of the ‘appearance’ which is Life itself as its source.

When we say, I appear angry or relaxed, it is an expression of ‘life’ animating this body. However, memory can twist the appearance to reality as if, I am a angry man/ bad man etc to imprint a permanent label of that expression onto the man itself, as if there could be an angry ‘man’. The temporary expression has been mentally made permanent - but mentally. Expressions change and changes are not permanent. No one gets this in the head, because there is no –one, other than an appearance and there is no head. Mind is also an expression of the source or the expression animator called ‘life’. Life becomes mind, to be used as a tool of the source to manage expressions or appearances into forced reality that is ‘not’.

What is reality? If there was no reality at all, and all that is perceived were appearances, the innocence would believe the perception to what is depicted, as if the child was assessing your anger. It believes what is expressed. So the truth remains hidden. However, the key to knowing anything is knowing itself and not the holding of the knowing as memory as a temporary part of the change. So reality by itself is a mindboggling, because as far as creation is concerned, reality is playing out as its expressions by being ‘what is’ as its appearance and boggling the mind into believing it is real, without a choice not to do so, life being mind itself.

Language is meaning making of perception. We have sign language, body language, spoken language, meaning happening to oneself as if in thought and emotions etc. So meaning making about perception, is happening as if multipronged through various forms of language and effecting the knowing, as if it was the only way to know, or forcing a knowing to take place, as if, there was  meaning or story of what the perception was. Story them becomes a reality. In the absence of a ‘separate’ knower, knowing itself acts as the knower, since all contents of experience have to known by itself, whichever way it chooses to and express, with life being the expression as well the knowing of it.

So knowing perception is packed foolproof system of getting to know whatever is depicted as real. What else there could be to know, other than knowing it the way knowing seems to know it. In fact, It is impossible to imagine any other way to beat the knowing to know better, as there is no other than knowing to do the knowing. So the game goes on, undetected as, the detector, that has to do the knowing as a  ‘who’, is also the expression and also the knower of it as the knowing of it. So life as the source of creation, expressing itself, and knowing itself by being ‘knowing’ also, is all in itself, known whichever way it desires to know itself.

So, all there is perception, made to feel real, as if there is world and people, apart from the perception of it, as depicted to the ‘knowing’ suffering or rejoicing, as the meaning given in the perception, converting its biggest joke of being its own expression but seeming like a world of objects.

Knowing at times, laughes at its own jokes, like we chuckle. Hahaha.