Duality operates only in language base and Non duality operates as a reality, non conceptual, even before language twists its meaning. Within Non-duality, the absences of all objectification, like past and future, is filled up using thoughts, happening in the ‘now’. The past and future operates as thoughts and images in the mind, to complete the process of feeling separate. One starts to feel the past and future in the now, even though it doesn’t exist. This magical experience ‘now’ of past, present and future, along with dualistic interpretation, as if all this is happen to some-one, makes a story of someone, negotiating the world.
The world and its interpretation as separate from the person, is happening automatically. Automatically meaning, consciousness or life, is talking this language through all bodies. The sensing is playing out automatically, as if to ‘no-one’ and is continuously interpreted is duality, as if ‘to’ someone. Dualistic language has been invented or discovered by wholeness, as if to create the absence of past and future, presence and absence and such other opposites, to be really experienced. One can experience presence and also absence. Moment we say, some one is dead, no matter, his relative is away from the dead guy, he seems to experience the absence of the dead guy. Such play, if we take out the story of the dead guy, is a charm being played out by wholeness, that is not understood at all and only the interpretation is taken for reality or as granted. It is like seeing a Chinese science fiction movie and getting its interpretation by children of different languages, that do not have an idea of the world of science or chinese, but enjoying the interpretation of their imagination. But once interpreted, it will seem real, because all children now reinterpret or re-cognise as per their first learning of the movie.
So, seeing the world, on the basis of language, makes the world of wholeness as a world, split into subject and objects, even while, the subject of seeing is also within the seeing, seen as an object by wholeness. It gives an impression, that an object can see objects, which is unlikely. I am an object of you and you are an object of me, is ridicules, when both are objects in the seeing. So the power of language, instilled from birth, makes us feel embodied, even though there isn’t a ‘we’, that is embodied and all there is, is consciousness operating bodies, speaking them and walking them. Consciousness is the seer of the seeing, hearer of the hearing and feeler of the feeling, some, seeming outside the body limits and some seeming inside the body limits, and using language to make seem that each body is a subject to the world of appearance, even though this body is also within such appearance.
So all that is required to in-see that, seeing and hearing is all there is, and not like language based, as if an ‘I’ can see and hear, separate from wholeness or consciousness or life. If the language is taken as, consciousness wanted to talk through all bodies, as if to play a game of separateness, the wholeness can come in the forefront. But if, language is to be believed as per its design of duality, then only dualistic living will take place.
In any case, since, life is living objects, it decides, what or how to play the game. All that we are as sentience or consciousness is a witness of all that is happening in wholeness.
No comments:
Post a Comment