We say that Sun exists in its own capacity, burning all the time and giving us light. May be there is another angle to it. If we analyse how we see a mirage, we understand that space forms some sort of a lens and the light rays behave in a particular way to make an appearance of water in the desert or on roads etc. However the water of the mirage is not factual but an appearance. Sometimes I wonder, why the light makes only a 'water' appearances regarding the mirage . Why not 'trees' and mountains or reflections of some objects in the vicinity of that spot - but thats another point because there is only appearances happening and it doesn’t matter one way or the other. I am sure if God stands in front of me for 10 minutes and disappears, it would only have to be an appearance and nothing miraculous about it. Appearances are miracles in itself. There are no small and big miracles in appearances. An appearance is a miracle in its own right.
To take up the suns existence, as a practical experiment, we find that, if we hold a magnifying glass in bright light and put a paper on its focus, the paper becomes hot and gets burnt. So if we assume that light exists in its own capacity prior to sun, the behaviour of these rays through space, that could act like a lens, would project a sun at its focal point in outer space to behave like a sun. This is a strong possibility if, mirages are a possibility, which we know is possible. So the sun appears as a consequence of light and need not be the other way.
So that was the sun. Now to some find fault with the moon ( the way we see it). Some times, the moon appears big and at other times small in the same duration of the night. It doesn’t mean the moon is going backward and forward in a wave form. It only appears to become bigger and smaller, due to space acting like a lens, sometimes dense and other times rare, to give this effect and so the moon appears differently. But for the moon to appear very big on a new moon compared to other days, science with explain an orbit for the moon to come near to earth at times and move away at times and make the orbit elliptical. For all I know, the moon doesn’t revolve with respect to the earth nor rotate.. And how do I know this?. Just look at the moon for half the night, night after night. You see a 'hare' figure on the moon with the ears on the left and the tail on the right. If the moon ever had to revolve or rotate, the head and tail would also have to change its position with respect to the seer. Now, one can put a far fetched explanation that the moon rotates once a day on its own axis and also revolves once a day round the axis of the earth in such a way that the face of the 'hare' is always stationary to the see-er. See what I mean?.
Now to attack the clouds for a while. That the vapours of the oceans is going up and forming the clouds and coming down as rains. Why rain only 4 months a years. Does it not vaporise round the year? Also just look at the shape of the cloud. They are in bunches of clouds and clear sky and sometimes moving and other times stationary. My problem is while the clouds are stationary. Water vapour is treated as gas. It permeates into space. Not that it should travel immediately, but, at least the way we are taught, vapours move in way as to maintain the vapour pressure or humidity the same around a point. Meaning to say, the denser cloud should have tapered off to areas where there is less vapour and become - as even as possible - and not like liquid or solids, hanging around rigidly. May be next time if you look at the clouds with clear sky in between you will try and understand what I am saying. It is just an appearance, like we draw on a drawing paper as kids.
This was too much scientific way of proving what science has told us and it seems that science still has some home work to be done. For those who have not had science as a subject, you can skip this post. But however you need to understand that science is nothing but a set of explanations to feel that appearances must be meaningful or logical. However at times there is no logic to logic. It is just a matter of time to prove that what was previously known as logical is now pure illogical.
To take up the suns existence, as a practical experiment, we find that, if we hold a magnifying glass in bright light and put a paper on its focus, the paper becomes hot and gets burnt. So if we assume that light exists in its own capacity prior to sun, the behaviour of these rays through space, that could act like a lens, would project a sun at its focal point in outer space to behave like a sun. This is a strong possibility if, mirages are a possibility, which we know is possible. So the sun appears as a consequence of light and need not be the other way.
So that was the sun. Now to some find fault with the moon ( the way we see it). Some times, the moon appears big and at other times small in the same duration of the night. It doesn’t mean the moon is going backward and forward in a wave form. It only appears to become bigger and smaller, due to space acting like a lens, sometimes dense and other times rare, to give this effect and so the moon appears differently. But for the moon to appear very big on a new moon compared to other days, science with explain an orbit for the moon to come near to earth at times and move away at times and make the orbit elliptical. For all I know, the moon doesn’t revolve with respect to the earth nor rotate.. And how do I know this?. Just look at the moon for half the night, night after night. You see a 'hare' figure on the moon with the ears on the left and the tail on the right. If the moon ever had to revolve or rotate, the head and tail would also have to change its position with respect to the seer. Now, one can put a far fetched explanation that the moon rotates once a day on its own axis and also revolves once a day round the axis of the earth in such a way that the face of the 'hare' is always stationary to the see-er. See what I mean?.
Now to attack the clouds for a while. That the vapours of the oceans is going up and forming the clouds and coming down as rains. Why rain only 4 months a years. Does it not vaporise round the year? Also just look at the shape of the cloud. They are in bunches of clouds and clear sky and sometimes moving and other times stationary. My problem is while the clouds are stationary. Water vapour is treated as gas. It permeates into space. Not that it should travel immediately, but, at least the way we are taught, vapours move in way as to maintain the vapour pressure or humidity the same around a point. Meaning to say, the denser cloud should have tapered off to areas where there is less vapour and become - as even as possible - and not like liquid or solids, hanging around rigidly. May be next time if you look at the clouds with clear sky in between you will try and understand what I am saying. It is just an appearance, like we draw on a drawing paper as kids.
This was too much scientific way of proving what science has told us and it seems that science still has some home work to be done. For those who have not had science as a subject, you can skip this post. But however you need to understand that science is nothing but a set of explanations to feel that appearances must be meaningful or logical. However at times there is no logic to logic. It is just a matter of time to prove that what was previously known as logical is now pure illogical.
No comments:
Post a Comment